RE: ugly-printed use cases output

Nobody else thinks a normative version of this might be a good thing to
have? I stand forelornly alone?
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:08 PM
> To: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output
>
>
> At 05:16 PM 10/22/2003, Howard Katz wrote:
>
> >Is there a full version of the Use Cases output available somewhere that
> >isn't pretty-printed? I'd find it useful for checking compliance against
> >whitespace-handling requirements. Pretty printing is nice to look at but
> >makes it harder to see if I'm doing whitespace properly. Does
> such a beast
> >exist?
>
> Nope! Sorry....
>
> Jonathan
>