- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 16:19:51 -0400
- To: "'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: David Marston <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Message-Id: <C2EB2A3A-72C5-49DB-837A-1D601760A862@w3.org>
Hi Dave, QA WG, There is still work to do on "Variability in Specification"[1] . Three sections need to be created or polished. * "4.2 Specification Umbrella"[2] The section has been completed last week before the publication. But I guess it deserves more work with more examples, illustration the issues. Potential Contributors: Dave, Dom, Karl, Lynne * "Specification category"[3] ISSUE: needs to explain the different categories, how to actually make a specification category analysis [[[ "Specification Category" -- this is under-specified. I.e., it is difficult to understand both the explanations of the different categories (they each need at least a sentence of definition/ discussion), and how this is critical to variability analysis. I myself would have difficulty writing a Spec. Cat. analysis based on this. We should develop the section better, or remove it. For now, maybe "green flag" it to indicate that we think it needs attention. ]]] - Specification categories unspecified - Lofton Henderson [4] *"6. Optional features"[5] ISSUE: needs to address discretionary items, and more largely, the remaining DoV. [[[ I think WCAG should be the primary example for functional levels, with DOM and/or CSS as secondary examples. I think there should be some mention of Discretionary Items, such as the treatment that Mark mailed in, so that you can then say that modules are not the same. A module is a larger functional package, and the variability question for an implementer is whether to implement or not. A discretionary item is a decision point where the implementer chooses how to deal with a situation which they must address. ]]] - Address discretionary items - Dave Marston [6] Dom replied [[[ I agree with you that there should be something about discretionary items in this document; however it won't make it for this publication; I've flagged an issue on this in the document; more largely, I think we should address the theoretical aspects of each DoV in it. ]]] - theoritical aspects of *each* DOV - Dom [7] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#umbrella [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#spec-cat [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0127.html [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-spec-variability-20050428/#optionality [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/att-0120/00- part [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0132.html -- Karl
Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 21:41:23 UTC