- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:56:49 -0600
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Overall, very good, and I think mostly suitable for a fpwd. Editorial Notes: ** I would change the list of "seven DoV" to numbered, instead of bullet. ** I notice that the glossary of SpecLite does not contain definitions for profiles, modules, etc. ** "Specification Category" -- this is under-specified. I.e., it is difficult to understand both the explanations of the different categories (they each need at least a sentence of definition/discussion), and how this is critical to variability analysis. I myself would have difficulty writing a Spec. Cat. analysis based on this. We should develop the section better, or remove it. For now, maybe "green flag" it to indicate that we think it needs attention. All for now, -Lofton. At 07:00 PM 8/20/2004 +0200, you wrote: >Hello QA WG, > >I've posted a first WG version of "Variability in Specifications" for >your review: >http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/08/qaframe-spec-advanced-20040830 (linked >from the WG home page) > >While a thorough review of its contents from everybody would be most >appreciated, at least a detailed review of the "newest" parts of the >documents is needed: >- the abstract and status >- the introduction > >The sections 2, 3 and 4 are mostly the same as the section "Concepts" in >the CR version of SpecGL, although I re-arranged some of its subparts >and tried to fix some references that didn't make sense out of SpecGL >context. > >Comments on bad language, broken sentences, non-understandable >references are asked in priority, but I'll try to handle requests for >enhancements as much as possible too; we need a stable document by >Wednesday EOB at the latest if we want to have enough time to request >permission for publication (as required by the transition requests) and >the lasts pubrules adjustments that may be needed. > >I also would like formal agreement by the WG to publish the document >minuted in our upcoming meeting on Monday - sorry for the short notice. > >Dom >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C/ERCIM >mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 23 August 2004 14:56:42 UTC