- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:16:08 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1110795368.11665.470.camel@stratustier>
Le dimanche 13 mars 2005 à 12:36 -0700, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > Could someone please clarify what "new item in new 'workflow' part" > means? This part was the result of our resolution to an issue raised by the TAG: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144 The point was that we wanted to keep the good practices about the process of writing a spec, but not in the same section as the verifiable requirements and good practices, so we decided to move them in a separate section. During the discussion with the WAI CG, we said that we could add something about how to develop a spec with accessibility, I18N, etc. in mind, by providing links to relevant resources. This section would be entirely informative. > What is the nature of this "new item"? From this summary, and from > the detailed minutes (below), it appears that we agreed to so > something about accessibility and other horizontal bits. This despite > "not get on consensus" the "not get on consensus" part was about making this a normative requirement in SpecGL > I am against making any significant content in SpecGL for WAI, > Internationalization, or any other worthy cause. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 10:16:10 UTC