Re: Issue 1144 regarding SpecGL 2.3

Le samedi 12 mars 2005 à 16:52 -0500, david_marston@us.ibm.com a écrit :
> (I took the action item to rewrite this last week.) 
> 2.3 Good Practice B: 
> 
>         The specification should provide sufficient detail in the
> normative references to prevent conflicting interpretations of the
> requirements imposed by reference. 

This is too long for the good practice part; what about 
"Provide details about normative references" or something along that?

(the rest of the proposal sounds good to me)
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org