- From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@sun.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:21:53 -0700
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Regrets... Lofton Henderson wrote: > > QAWG -- > > Unless you are an optional attendee, please respond with regrets. > (Also see below about 4-aug telecon). > > Monday will be an optional telecon, UNLESS you are chair or > OpsGL/SpecGL (and ET) editor. It will be a working/planning call for > chairs and editors, to firm up a realistic schedule for getting OpsGL > and SpecGL to CR+. > > Goals. Here are some things we need to nail... > > 1.) Agree on a doable schedule; > 2.) Discuss how we will partition the DoC document(s) -- > per-commenter, per-spec? or single large DoC on all issues and > specs? or other? > 3.) How and by whom to produce DoC documents(s). > 4.) Any stylesheet and/or XSLT transform needs; > 5.) What to do if a commentor objects to our DoC? > 6.) When to alert the Directors telecon people and try to schedule the > CR telecon(s). > 7.) Both together (OpsGL & SpecGL)? Or, OpsGL+Intro first, and SpecGL > maybe 2-4 weeks later? > 8.) ...etc... > > Others? > > About 4-aug telecon > ===== > > On the agenda for the *next* (4-august) telecon is a discussion of our > new activity statements and charters. Current drafts are: > >> - activity statement renewal >> _http://www.w3.org/QA/Activity-200307.html_ >> - charter WG >> _http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter200307.html_ >> - charter IG >> _http://www.w3.org/QA/IG/charter200307.html_ > > > One issue/difficulty that came up in drafting these was: what are our > Test Materials. (We are required by OpsGL to document these in our > charter.) > > Regards, > -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 10:23:00 UTC