- From: Sandra Martinez <sandra.martinez@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:36:01 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Regrets. At 02:54 PM 7/18/2003 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >QAWG -- > >Unless you are an optional attendee, please respond with regrets. (Also >see below about 4-aug telecon). > >Monday will be an optional telecon, UNLESS you are chair or OpsGL/SpecGL >(and ET) editor. It will be a working/planning call for chairs and >editors, to firm up a realistic schedule for getting OpsGL and SpecGL to CR+. > >Goals. Here are some things we need to nail... > >1.) Agree on a doable schedule; >2.) Discuss how we will partition the DoC document(s) -- per-commenter, >per-spec? or single large DoC on all issues and specs? or other? >3.) How and by whom to produce DoC documents(s). >4.) Any stylesheet and/or XSLT transform needs; >5.) What to do if a commentor objects to our DoC? >6.) When to alert the Directors telecon people and try to schedule the CR >telecon(s). >7.) Both together (OpsGL & SpecGL)? Or, OpsGL+Intro first, and SpecGL >maybe 2-4 weeks later? >8.) ...etc... > >Others? > >About 4-aug telecon >===== > >On the agenda for the *next* (4-august) telecon is a discussion of our new >activity statements and charters. Current drafts are: > >>- activity statement renewal >>http://www.w3.org/QA/Activity-200307.html >>- charter WG >>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter200307.html >>- charter IG >>http://www.w3.org/QA/IG/charter200307.html > >One issue/difficulty that came up in drafting these was: what are our >Test Materials. (We are required by OpsGL to document these in our charter.) > >Regards, >-Lofton. Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.gov
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 08:36:43 UTC