- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:54:42 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030718144417.02c5c660@rockynet.com>
QAWG -- Unless you are an optional attendee, please respond with regrets. (Also see below about 4-aug telecon). Monday will be an optional telecon, UNLESS you are chair or OpsGL/SpecGL (and ET) editor. It will be a working/planning call for chairs and editors, to firm up a realistic schedule for getting OpsGL and SpecGL to CR+. Goals. Here are some things we need to nail... 1.) Agree on a doable schedule; 2.) Discuss how we will partition the DoC document(s) -- per-commenter, per-spec? or single large DoC on all issues and specs? or other? 3.) How and by whom to produce DoC documents(s). 4.) Any stylesheet and/or XSLT transform needs; 5.) What to do if a commentor objects to our DoC? 6.) When to alert the Directors telecon people and try to schedule the CR telecon(s). 7.) Both together (OpsGL & SpecGL)? Or, OpsGL+Intro first, and SpecGL maybe 2-4 weeks later? 8.) ...etc... Others? About 4-aug telecon ===== On the agenda for the *next* (4-august) telecon is a discussion of our new activity statements and charters. Current drafts are: >- activity statement renewal >http://www.w3.org/QA/Activity-200307.html >- charter WG >http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter200307.html >- charter IG >http://www.w3.org/QA/IG/charter200307.html One issue/difficulty that came up in drafting these was: what are our Test Materials. (We are required by OpsGL to document these in our charter.) Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 17:01:46 UTC