Re: Monday (28 July) QAWG telecon agenda [DRAFT]

Regrets.  Vacation.

At 02:54 PM 7/18/2003 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:

>QAWG  --
>
>Unless you are an optional attendee, please respond with regrets.  (Also 
>see below about 4-aug telecon).
>
>Monday will be an optional telecon, UNLESS you are chair or OpsGL/SpecGL 
>(and ET) editor.  It will be a working/planning call for chairs and 
>editors, to firm up a realistic schedule for getting OpsGL and SpecGL to CR+.
>
>Goals.  Here are some things we need to nail...
>
>1.) Agree on a doable schedule;
>2.) Discuss how we will partition the DoC document(s) -- per-commenter, 
>per-spec?  or single large DoC on all issues and specs?  or other?
>3.) How and by whom to produce DoC documents(s).
>4.) Any stylesheet and/or XSLT transform needs;
>5.) What to do if a commentor objects to our DoC?
>6.) When to alert the Directors telecon people and try to schedule the CR 
>telecon(s).
>7.) Both together (OpsGL & SpecGL)?  Or, OpsGL+Intro first, and SpecGL 
>maybe 2-4 weeks later?
>8.) ...etc...
>
>Others?
>
>About 4-aug telecon
>=====
>
>On the agenda for the *next* (4-august) telecon is a discussion of our new 
>activity statements and charters.  Current drafts are:
>
>>- activity statement renewal
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/Activity-200307.html
>>- charter WG
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/charter200307.html
>>- charter IG
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/IG/charter200307.html
>
>One issue/difficulty that came up in drafting these was:  what are our 
>Test Materials.  (We are required by OpsGL to document these in our charter.)
>
>Regards,
>-Lofton.