- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 09:29:21 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Thanks, Dom, for the clarification. It sounds easy enough to get approval, especially if we start early. I think everyone would like to see a shorter name, and it seems that there are two popular suggestions: 1.) "QA Framework: Operational Guidelines" [shortname could remain unchanged, "qaframe-ops"] 2.) "QA Framework: Process Guidelines" [shortname "qaframe-proc" would make more sense] Shall we have a quick straw poll at the start of Friday's telcon? (Btw, I have requested the bridge but not yet gotten confirmation. However the calendar is quite empty at that time, so I don't anticipate difficulties. Details later, when I get them.) -Lofton. At 04:17 PM 3/5/02 +0100, you wrote: >le lun 04-03-2002 à 23:55, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > > Does anyone know ... is there any problem with changing shortname? Now it > > is qaframe-ops. Qaframe-proc would fit better, if title were "Process > > Guidelines". I don't know if there are any rules or conventions about how > > accurate shortname should be, and if it can change early in WD > > cycle. (There is a "Note:" in pubrules [1], but I don't exactly > understand > > its implications.) > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules > >You can change the title and the shortname of a publication, but you >need to ask for Director's approval on these changes (Director being Tim >or 2 persons from the management Team). > >Dom >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C's Webmaster >mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 11:40:39 UTC