Re: MathML Core authoring tools?

On 06/12/2022 20:04, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> I agree the list should be updated. And if the list is targeted to 
> MathML Core, then Deyan's suggestion of only including projects with 
> active development makes sense for MathML generators. However, there 
> is the big question of who has the time to do it.
>
> Two suggested changes:
> 1. Although some small number of people (~2%) still use IE, it seems 
> like a dead end so I'd be in favor of removing MathPlayer since it 
> only works with IE.

Done in 
https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=Math_Tools&type=revision&diff=115385&oldid=115384


> 2. I would add mathlive to the list. It likely belongs in several 
> categories given that it also has a computation engine associated with it.
>
> I think it makes sense to add an "assistive technology" section 
> listing AT that uses MathML. Of course, getting a good list requires 
> time, and that's hard to get.

Feel free to add these ;-)

-- 
Frédéric Wang