- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:13:38 +0200
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: 'Martin Duerst' <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, 'Jonathan Rosenne' <rosennej@qsm.co.il>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, 'W3C Offices' <w3c-office-pr@w3.org>
> Yes. My point was that even in English I have taken action to find a home > page address that is more easily memorable and communicable than > people.w3.org/rishida (which is not so complicated to start with, but > sufficiently so to cause problems), so it is clear to me that URIs are not > always opaque, and that furthermore being able to write them in your own > language and script has got to be very helpful. I agree. I'm saying two things. People should not expect a full coverage of textual expression in DNS space, since it is essentially an ID space similar to file names, not a real content medium. (this looks like a simplification but it isn't, DNS is a system with application constraints (e.g. what the browser does), protocols contraints, bind implementation constraints, registry server constraints, registrar commercial constraints, ICANN policy constraints, etc.) We're going to face some print/digital compatibility issues that we are unprepared to deal with because of the predominance of the latin ascii subset in today's exchanges (for everybody, not just latin based cultures). RFID will solve that :)
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 12:14:04 UTC