- From: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:12:17 -0500
- To: christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be, www-international@w3.org
Hmm, the content language is not for the most part anything other than human, unless it includes snitches of code. So I still think "natural" is sort of excessive, but anyway, not important. Thanks. --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar@hotmail.com > > >Hi, > >At 20:09 9/03/2007, CE Whitehead wrote: > >>Hi, when I emailed you before requesting to translate the working draft, >>"Internationalization Best Practices: Specifying Language in XHTML & HTML >>Content" >>(http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-i18n-html-tech-lang-20060721/) >>I was told not to translate a working draft as such was subject to change; >>then in another discussion someone mentioned that links to such >>translations were welcome through the email at the discussion list for the >>working draft. >> >>(...) >>Also a question about "the natural language of the content"--what other >>languages are used in the content? So this was really a question about >>wording; thought "natural" was redundant here.) > >This refers to "human language", as opposed to computer languages, so >"natural" is not redundant, although I find it a misnomer [1]. > >Best regards, > >Christophe > >[1] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2007JanMar/0028.html > >-- >Christophe Strobbe >K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on >Document Architectures >Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM >tel: +32 16 32 85 51 >http://www.docarch.be/ > > >Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm > > _________________________________________________________________ Rates near 39yr lows! $430K Loan for $1,399/mo - Paying Too Much? Calculate new payment http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18226&moid=7581
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 16:12:36 UTC