Re: Transliteration standards: possible impact on internationaliz ation from Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no on 1997-11-19 (www-international@w3.org from October to December 1997)

From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 03:20:36 -0500
To: Carrasco Benitez Manuel <manuel.carrasco@emea.eudra.org>
cc: "'Jonathan Rosenne'" <rosenne@NetVision.net.il>, "'Converse@sesame.demon.co.uk'" <Converse@sesame.demon.co.uk>, i18n@dkuug.dk, xojig@xopen.co.uk, sc22wg14@dkuug.dk, www-international@w3.org, wgi18n@terena.nl, keld@dkuug.dk
Message-ID: <22387.879927636@dale.uninett.no>

Eh.....what kind of language would you characterize French transliterated
into Hebrew as?
Is there a difference between Hebrew transliterated into French and
Hebrew transliterated into English?
In Serbian text transliterated between cyrillic and Latin script, which
one (if any) is the transliteration?

Or are you really talking about SCRIPT tags?
(Michael Everson had some ideas on script tags years ago....)

                           Harald A

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 1997 03:20:57 UTC