- From: M.T. Carrasco Benitez <carrasco@innet.lu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 01:39:36 +0100 (MET)
- To: Jonas Brandel <jonasbr@MICROSOFT.com>
- cc: "'gtn@ebt.com'" <gtn@ebt.com>, www-international@w3.org
> Possibly a stupid comment, but shouldn't they both be allowed. A very good point: It would be better if only one form for the language label is allowed. Otherwise, it is bound to be more confusing and the programs would have to check for all the possible forms. > > <HTML LANG=...> to enable language tagging of the HTML > and <META HTTP-EQUIV...> to *fake* the HTTP header?! Whatever form is choosen, it has to *fake* the HTTP header. In particular, if the <HTML LANG=...> is choosen the server must fake the HTTP header as in the other <META HTTP-EQUIV...>. Regards Tomas
Received on Thursday, 27 February 1997 19:38:35 UTC