- From: Eric A. Perlman <ericp@well.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 1995 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Bill Brooks <wbrooks@trumpet.aix.calpoly.edu>
- Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org
On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Bill Brooks wrote: > > HTML 1.0 specified that image formats should be one of .xbm or .gif. > But I can't find anything in the 3.0 standard that says whether or not > JPEG is a supported format. Was this intentional? Or was it just to get > around the whole .gif vs. .png issue? Maybe it's in some other section > than where I expected to find it. Help me out. This has nothing to do with HTML. but browsers. All browsers can display .xbm and .gif (prefered). New ones can display JPEG. -eric +----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+ | Eric A Perlman | http://www.yikes.com/ | SPLAT! | | ericp@well.com | http://crew.bhs.berkeley.k12.ca.us/Crew/ | /dev/null | +----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 1995 13:33:29 UTC