Re: Image formats deleted from 3.0?

On Tue, 4 Jul 1995, Bill Brooks wrote:

> 
> HTML 1.0 specified that image formats should be one of .xbm or .gif. 
> But I can't find anything in the 3.0 standard that says whether or not 
> JPEG is a supported format. Was this intentional? Or was it just to get 
> around the whole .gif vs. .png issue? Maybe it's in some other section 
> than where I expected to find it. Help me out. 

This has nothing to do with HTML. but browsers.

All browsers can display .xbm and .gif (prefered). New ones can display 
JPEG.

-eric


+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+
| Eric A Perlman |             http://www.yikes.com/            | SPLAT!      |
| ericp@well.com |   http://crew.bhs.berkeley.k12.ca.us/Crew/   | /dev/null   |
+----------------+----------------------------------------------+-------------+

Received on Tuesday, 4 July 1995 13:33:29 UTC