- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:26:25 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM <lehors@us.ibm.com>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
On 11/24/2014 10:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Facts that don't appear to be in active dispute: > > ... > > CC-BY and the W3C document license are incompatible with CC0, GPL[4], > and the Mozilla Public License[5]. For the record, there is some dispute about the above statement. Wendy told me that she believes that CC-BY is compatible with GPL. As a practical matter, this is mooted by the fact that those that want the compatibility follow FSF's ruling. > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Nov/0029.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Nov/0036.html > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0157.html > [4] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html > [5] https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html > [6] http://www.w3.org/2009/12/Member-Agreement#ipr > [7] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2007/06-invited-expert#L118 > [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Nov/0034.html > [9] http://intertwingly.net/blog/2014/11/20/WHATWG-W3C-Collaboration > [10] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Nov/0148.html
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 02:26:36 UTC