- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:30:56 +0100
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, "lehors@us.ibm.com >> Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM" <lehors@us.ibm.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 11/24/2014 7:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: >>> I don't recall that we were discussing hypotheticals in that meeting. >> >> That's surprising to say the least. We've discussed that exact >> scenario several more times afterwards. > > Your previous comment and my response related to "that meeting". That is why I used the word "more". > I agree that we've discussed numerous proposals and as you know W3C has been > trying hard to find one that works for all involved. I don't recall Sam's > specific proposal which I believe has elements which make it more workable. I know of no such thing. In fact, last time this was discussed W3C didn't even get back to me. I also don't see how Sam's proposal is different. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 15:31:25 UTC