- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:46:30 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM <lehors@us.ibm.com>, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
On 11/24/2014 10:23 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> Anne seems to have come to the conclusion that "the >> moment a non-W3C document enters W3C space, it can no longer be developed >> outside the W3C". I see nothing that supports that conclusion. > > I continue to dislike that you keep quoting me out of context without > asking for clarification from me first. I linked to the full context. I copied you in the email in the hopes that you would provide additional context, if such were needed. I see that you have now done so, and for that, I thank you. > The condition you're missing is that it would be the same person > editing the document. I cannot edit X inside and outside the W3C > simultaneously. That condition was not in your email. Whether or not Jeff led you to believe this is in dispute. Either way, I see nothing in the existing Membership or Invited Expert agreements that supports this claim. I will now ask you for clarification as to why you believe this claim to be true. > Which is one of the now many reasons why the WHATWG > follows "Hypothetical" #1, without it really being hypothetical. I will now ask you for clarification as to what the other reasons are that the WHATWG would not be willing to collaborate on the URL Specification. I remain interested in collaborating with everybody. - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 15:47:40 UTC