- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:12:20 +0000
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnoHgbJUqn_1FazjzGH6SjR+4FMqb28hpefSD5tzb+g3A@mail.gmail.com>
hi Jeffe, Ian has stated in response [1]: "I follow it, like everyone else, exactly to the extent that I think it requires us to do the right thing for the Web. When the process requires us to do something bad for the Web, I ignore it." I say fair play to him and as long as any other participant in the process can opt out of the process whenever he/she thinks it's "bad for the Web," and the W3C is OK with that, then we have a level playing field for all particpants. but his stament does appear to contradict your statement: "he agrees to follow the W3C Process" For people such as myself who have invested a lot of time and energy working within, what is at times a tortuous process, in effecting change to the HTML5 specification, for what I believe to be the 'right thing for the Web'. I don't want to see that work undermined and undone by someone who is in a powerful position, because he or she thinks they own rights on what is the 'right thing for the Web'. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0032.html best regards Stevef On 25 January 2012 23:58, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > On 1/25/2012 4:53 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > Hi Philippe, > > Ian Hickson wrote: [1] > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > > > as a reminder, as editor of several documents for the Web Applications > > and HTML Working Group, you agreed to follow the W3C Process, as well as > > following the HTML Decision Policy of the HTML Working Group. If this is > > no longer the case, you should let the Chairs of those Groups aware of > > this, > > The chairs of both groups, as well as yourself, and Jeff, are fully aware > of this already. > > > Let me say what I am fully aware of: > > 1. Ian has fundamental disagreements with the way that the W3C process > works. He has been very clear about that. > > 2. Nonetheless, for situations that he is wearing his hat as Editor within > a W3C Working Group, he agrees to follow the W3C Process. Part of the > reason is a mutual desire to have HTML work proceed both in W3C (under its > process) and WHATWG (under its process), and to keep HTML 5 as aligned as > possible with HTML LS. > > 3. There is already a consensus that some of the points that he has made > about standardization processes are good points - although not for the > goals of W3C Working Groups. Many of these points have been adopted for > W3C Community Groups which has different objectives. > > 4. On the whole, the Chairs have reported to me that they are satisfied > that Ian has fulfilled the commitments (point 2 above) to follow the W3C > Process. There have been exceptions which (to date) we have successfully > worked through. > > 5. Ian is so much "bought in" to W3C, that on one occasion where he > thought the Chairs had made a mistake, he actually escalated the Chairs' > decision to the W3C CEO. (nb., after a brief discussion between the CEO, > Chairs, and Editor - all agreed that the Chairs and Editor would resolve > the issue and the CEO did not enter the HTML 5 Decision Process.) > > > > -- > Ian Hickson > > > So, a working group member who plays a pivotal role does not agree > to follow the W3C Process, as well as follow the HTML Decision Policy of > the HTML Working Group. > > > Hence Ian has been following the W3C Process. > > > > > Why should any of us? > > regards > Stevef > > > > On 25 January 2012 11:39, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Phillippe, >> >> >> Ian Hickson wrote [1]: >> >> "Nobody really follows the W3C process. Some claim to, others (such as >> myself) do not. Being on a W3C list certainly doesn't imply anything >> about >> one's actions with respect to the hallowed Process." >> >> >> I have acted under the assumption that participation in working groups >> is dependent on my agreeing to, and attempting in good faith, to abide by >> W3C process, it appears that I and others have been mislead. >> >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0025.html >> >> >> -- >> with regards >> >> Steve Faulkner >> Technical Director - TPG >> >> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | >> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner >> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - >> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ >> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html >> >> >> > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | > www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner > HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - > dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ > Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html > > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 10:13:09 UTC