W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:36:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1201242034280.2081@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Glenn Adams wrote:
> Right. And last time I checked this is a W3C mailing list, a W3C group, 
> and W3C documents under discussion. So presumably we sentient beings 
> have at least implicitly signed up to the W3C Process (whether we agree 
> with it or not).

I think that assumption is rather obviously not correct. :-)

Nobody really follows the W3C process. Some claim to, others (such as 
myself) do not. Being on a W3C list certainly doesn't imply anything about 
one's actions with respect to the hallowed Process.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:36:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:34:12 UTC