- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:04:10 +0200
- To: www-archive@w3.org
A reply to a private email. Adrian objected[1] to the current name, I agreed and suggested[2] an alternative, David Flanagan suggests[3] "WebDOM", I explain[4] why "DOM4" is better, David seems[5] fine with it. After not hearing anything from Adrian I complain[6], and he replies[7] not giving any concrete suggestions other than that "DOM4" might be too unbounded given that the scope is unclear. I tell[8] him I clarified the scope even more. A little before Arthur started[9] the organization thread, where Adrian is again vague[10] and Arthur ends up saying[11] the scope is not clear (which I do not believe[12] is true as I clarified it mid-August). Meanwhile I still have not gotten feedback on the proposed name nor how the "Goals" section does not address the intended scope, but I have gotten so much wishy washy process email I feel somewhat annoyed. [1]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0642.html> [2]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0644.html> [3]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0663.html> [4]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0669.html> [5]<http://twitter.com/__DavidFlanagan/status/99492586250711040> [6]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0869.html> [7]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0897.html> [8]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0910.html> [9]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/thread.html#msg789> [10]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0896.html> [11]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1212.html> [12]<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1213.html> -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2011 15:04:50 UTC