- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:32:42 +0200
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Michael Champion" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:52:33 +0200, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote: > It's harder to participate without understanding the scope of the > problems being solved. Bringing that point up just before publication as a means to block said publication is not helpful. There has been ample opportunity for Microsoft to discuss this. > As I wrote in the separate thread to Art, we prefer a scoped spec where > we've agreed which problems we're trying to solve rather than something > open ended. "DOM4" seems a bit too unbounded in that context but > agreeing on the goals for this spec, be it Core or something else will > help answer the questions. The goals of the specification are listed in the specification. I have clarified them even further hoping it will resolve the stated confusion. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#goals > I think there are some good ideas in this spec including some things > that will be helpful to developers to have written down. We spent a lot > of time while we were building IE9 testing to see which parts of the DOM > specs were applicable to the browsable web platform. This is something > we will continue to help with though our immediate priority is helping > to move DOM L3 Events forward. Looking forward to your first set of technical feedback. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 11:33:19 UTC