- From: David Flanagan <dflanagan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:17:30 -0700
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman
> <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now
>> causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about
>> this. We should fix the problem.
>
> Alright, how about "DOM4"?
I suspect it is the inclusion of the word "core" that causes the
confusion, not the lack of a version number. If you google "dom core"
you get lots of hits for various old Level 2 and Level 3 specs. Given
how much this spec removes from level 2 and level 3, it seem strange to
give it a version number in the same series...
How about "WebDOM" instead?
David
>
>>>> This functionality shouldn't be pulled into DOM Core. We believe
>>>> improvements for mutation events should be kept a separate deliverable
>>>> for this working group (ADMN).
>>>
>>> I am not sure what ADMN means.
>>
>> This is in the WG charter.
>
> Thanks. (FWIW, several proposals so far have been synchronous.)
>
>
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 22:18:08 UTC