- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:53:25 +0900
- To: Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, www-archive@w3.org
Hi Noah, Per the new process documented in in draft-nottingham-http-link-header / RFC 5988, I recently sent a message[1] to the links-relations@ietf.org mailing list requesting registration of the relation name "up": [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/current/msg00062.html In a reply[1], Mark Nottingham (in his role as the Designated Expert for the link-relations registry) indicated that I should coordinate with you about registration for the "up" relation name, since you are the person who originally registered the "up" relation. [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations/current/msg00080.html So, if you could please review the text at the end of this message and let Mark and I know if it looks OK, I'd appreciate it. If it's not OK as-is, the preferred means for requesting a change would be for you to file a bug in the HTML WG bugzilla database: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=HTML5%20spec%20(editor:%20Ian%20Hickson)&priority=P3 http://w3.org/brief/MjA2 Here are the registration details I've proposed: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Relation Name: up Description: Provides a link to a document giving the context for the current document. Reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-up Notes: Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before publication of next Working Draft ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2010 13:53:28 UTC