- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:09:01 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > ... > The problem here is that you're somehow categorising the list of > examples given in the charter, and using that to somehow limit the class > of independent vocabularies that are being referred to by the charter. I > do not believe that is a reasonable interpretation. The actual > requirement in the charter just says "independently developed > vocabularies", without placing any restrictions on what type of > independent vocabularies are being referred to. > ... I don't follow. Are you saying that the fact that specific examples are listed doesn't mean anything? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 11:09:38 UTC