W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2010

Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4B4F0550.4030705@lachy.id.au>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> ...
>> The problem here is that you're somehow categorising the list of
>> examples given in the charter, and using that to somehow limit the
>> class of independent vocabularies that are being referred to by the
>> charter. I do not believe that is a reasonable interpretation. The
>> actual requirement in the charter just says "independently developed
>> vocabularies", without placing any restrictions on what type of
>> independent vocabularies are being referred to.
>> ...
>
> I don't follow. Are you saying that the fact that specific examples are
> listed doesn't mean anything?

No, I'm saying that they're just examples and it's wrong to infer 
anything from them beyond that fact, particularly in relation to which 
other independent vocabularies may or may not be applicable to the 
requirement.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 11:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:45 UTC