- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:11:23 +0900
- To: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Cc: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>, "'Bonner, Matt'" <matt.bonner@hp.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Le 25 août 2008 à 16:56, Kristof Zelechovski a écrit : > I can see no way for scientific journals to include RDFa information > in HTML > because they usually do not use HTML as a primary medium. They have > their > own established ways to express information about published content; > their > HTML counterpart, if any, should use HTML+CSS to do it the same way. > The gain from including license information about bibliographic > references > is actually a loss (of clarity) to me. This information should be > available > where the referenced publication appears, not where it is referenced. Been there, done that. You should read about * Science Commons http://sciencecommons.org/ * Peer Review debate from Nature http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/ * At articles repositories such as http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/ http://www.aanda.org/ http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/ApJ/ + the thousands of personal pages where share the list of their articles. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 08:12:02 UTC