W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2008

RE: [whatwg] Creative Commons Rights Expression Language

From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:50:24 +0200
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@adida.net>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'Bonner, Matt'" <matt.bonner@hp.com>, "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5EB9A759E72140EDA11416F9823F7866@POCZTOWIEC>

It is not metadata vs data, it is metadata vs content.  Data in HTML
documents go into the SCRIPT element and they are usually expected to be
private to the page.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] 
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:45 PM
To: Kristof Zelechovski
Cc: 'Ben Adida'; 'Ian Hickson'; 'Bonner, Matt'; 'Dan Brickley'; 'Tab Atkins
Jr.'; 'Henri Sivonen'; www-archive@w3.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Creative Commons Rights Expression Language

Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> Forcing metadata into content is an incompatible modification.  I mean,
> having link metadata close to resource link is compatible, although
> suboptimal; putting document metadata within document content is
> incompatible.
> Chris

Please precisely define "metadata" vs "data".

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 25 August 2008 08:03:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:32 UTC