- From: Morten Frederiksen <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:22:53 +0100
- To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
Hi all, On Thursday 26 February 2004 20:37, Benjamin Nowack wrote: > After today's chat I updated the image region vocabulary > proposal Looks really nice. > - changed temporary namespace to > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/image-regions# Great. Nothing like a w3 namespace to inspire confidence... > - focus is on regions now, I removed the redundant terms > Image, depicts, depiction, width, height. The DL version > "redefines" Jim's width and height, this may be wrong, as > they now have a domain of foaf:Image and the range is > xsd:positiveInteger. we can still create imreg:width and > imreg:height. I think we should, since otherwise inference-capable system will get confused, and think a region is an image that can be displayed - like we talked about earlier. The prose for coords property is really hard to understand (what's the exact difference between "separated" and "delimited"?). I know it's probably based on my own bad write-up, but still! :-) An example for each region type would go a long way. Regards, Morten ================= This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:24:16 UTC