>On Feb 23, 2004, at 17:32, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> >> >>I have been being beaten up further from the pragmatic wing by Chris >>Bizer - He is beginning to convince me ... >> >> >>My understanding of his key arguments is as follows: >> >>- use vocab as much as possible, not syntactic mechanisms >> : impacts graphset tag name >> asserted attribute > >Fair enough. Though we could consider the attribute value as >a short hand, which generates a second anonymous graph containing >the statement about assertion of the first graph. > >We may, though, end up with an infinite recursion. I.e., we have >a graph X that is asserted. In order to say that X is asserted, >we have to have another graph X' containing a statement that >X is asserted. But if X' is also asserted, we have to have another >graph X'' with a statement saying that X' is asserted, etc., etc. Lewis Carroll was there first: http://www.lewiscarroll.org/achilles.html > >??? Nah, don't worry about it. Once you assert something, its asserted. You don't need to assert the assertion. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 21:13:12 UTC