- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:56:55 -0800
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Marc Hadley" <mark.hadley@Sun.COM>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Wow! Henrik >Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: >> Given the success of the table describing mU and role I was >wondering >> whether we can clarify issue 250 by adding another one listing the >> roles in a similar manner (see attached) in section 2.2 >where we have >> the list of role definitions [1]. This may make it easier to >see than >> the current bullet list. > >Sounds good. Done. > >> Btw, in table 2 "SOAP Nodes Forwarding behaviour", we should >refer to >> the names "next", "ultimateReceiver", and "none" as *short-names* as >> we in section 2.2 defined the role *name* as a URI. > >Sounds good as well. Done.
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 17:56:57 UTC