Re: Question on the naming of "Web Method Specification Feature" in part 2 section 6.4

+1 (or at least +.75).  Fine with me.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
11/04/2002 11:46 AM

 
        To:     Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
        cc:     Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <mark.hadley@Sun.COM>, 
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-archive@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Question on the naming of "Web Method Specification Feature" in part 2 
section 6.4


Looks weird indeed.

I would suggest:

   "SOAP Web Method Feature"

Jean-Jacques.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> In implementing the editors' action item:
> 
> "Generate a reference for the various features and bindings pointing
> back to the appropriate place in SOAP 1.2 INSTEAD of the one-sentence
> found like "Protocol binding specifications may use this URI to declare
> their support for the MEP and its associated semantics""
> 
> I found it weird that in part 2, section "6.4 Web Method Specification
> Feature", we call it the "Web Method *Specification* Feature". I would
> have thought that it was merely the "Web Method Feature" or
> alternatively "Web Method SOAP Feature", no?
> 
> The text in section 6.4 uses both versions but I wanted to check before
> changing anything and you agree that this is nothing but editorial.
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com 
>

Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 14:24:33 UTC