- From: Jeff Hunt <jeff.hunt@nzbus.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:52:52 +0000
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
I hope Amaya is not lowering its standards. It is just beginning to become a practical editor that naive users can use to generate good code. Generally if the code is good Amaya displays it well and I love being able to paste in raw text and have it instantly formatted. The world needs a simple, quality editor/creator of valid code. If it is not Amaya, is there an alternative? On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 11:03 -0400, ve3ll@cogeco.ca wrote: > well it sure doesn't demonstrate CSS2 (a W3 technology) > very well at all .... > > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:43:00 +0100, <ve3ll@cogeco.ca> wrote: > > > To claim that Amaya is a WYSIWYG editor, it should > > produce screens that are similar on browsers normally > > encountered on the internet. Otherwise the editor is > > useless to web developers.... Better results are obtained by > > using macro style editors and verifying with w3 or wdg validators.-- > > The statement that Amaya is a WYSIWYG editor has been dropped from it's > home page. It is now more of a demonstration/test platform for WC > technology. > > Christopher > > -- > 33 Farfield Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QP, > United Kingdom > e-mail: translations@cechinatrans.demon.co.uk > Telephone: +44 (0)1274 584832 > Mobile: 0779 099 5251--
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 13:02:56 UTC