- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 07:27:02 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
At 04:41 AM 9/16/2002 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Should checkpoint 2.9 really be a checkpoint, or is it only a technique? Unless it's a checkpoint I fear that the instruction in the "descriptive" paragraph: "When using modules from other schema, use them with the same semantics as originally intended." might be lost. In fact I'm not sure I understand how this got to be an issue. It's a checkpoint. -- Love. It's Bad Luck to be Superstitious!
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 10:27:22 UTC