Re: [XAG] Issues and Changes

At 04:41 AM 9/16/2002 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>Should checkpoint 2.9 really be a checkpoint, or is it only a technique?

Unless it's a checkpoint I fear that the instruction in the "descriptive" 
paragraph: "When using modules from other schema, use them with the same 
semantics as originally intended." might be lost.

In fact I'm not sure I understand how this got to be an issue. It's a 
checkpoint.

--
Love.

It's Bad Luck to be Superstitious!

Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 10:27:22 UTC