- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 04:41:09 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Hi, the PFWG resolved some existing issues (which will be reflected in the new draft) and introduced a new issue. New Issue: Should checkpoint 2.9 really be a checkpoint, or is it only a technique? Issues resolved: Merge checkpoint 1.3 into checkpoint 2.9. See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/issues#Merge1 Do not merge checkpoints 1.1 and 1.2. See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/issues#Merge1 Editorial changes resolved. See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/issues#Editorial Definitions will now be taken from the WAI Glossary by default. See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/issues#Definition These chagnes will be reflected in the new XAG draft which will be published shortly - http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/xag-20020915 cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 04:41:17 UTC