- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:26:28 -0600
- To: Paul Adelson <paul.adelson@citicorp.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@srl.rmit.edu.au>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: WAI UA group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I like your point about mouseover events. Rather than saying a specific event is inaccessible or accessible, I think we need to focus on accessible design guidelines. Jon At 10:58 AM 10/29/98 -0600, Paul Adelson wrote: >Sorry for the cross-post, but there is an important issue being overlooked >here that pertains to both UA and PAGL: > >onMouseOver can enhance accessibility and there is no effective alternative at >this time, yet people are suggesting it not be used. > >For low-vision users, it is very helpful to get extra visual feedback -- as >can be provided by highlighting a link when the mouse cursor passes over it. >Using the events in this way can improve accessibility for people with low >vision and does not limit accessibility for people who don't use a mouse. > >The problem arises when onMouseOver is used for more complicated processes -- >for instance, using mouseover on images to pop up descriptive text somewhere >else on the screen, resulting in descriptive text that disappears whenever the >user tries to move their focus to it. > >Someone suggested that if the PAGL says not to use onMouseOver we could figure >that intelligent web developers will ignore the guideline in valid >curcomstances. Perhaps it would be better to assume that many readers of the >guidelines will be naive on these issues, and that the guidelines should >specify how the events can be used in a positive way and when they can be >detrimental? > >For the UA group, maybe this is an opportunity to think about how to make >'onMouseOver' more generic. Thinking back to our recent discussions of 'Point >of Regard', would a set of 'onRegard' or 'onUserCursor' events be a plausible >superset of 'onMouse' that could be applied to a broader range of interactive >devices? > > >Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >> The discussion on PAGL was about logical events (those which specified a >> function) as opposed to device-dependent events. >> >> The division below was the list as it stands. It occurred to me that we >> could easily enough add onActivate - corresponding in a mouse interface to >> onClick, and to pressing return to activate the item with focus in a >> keyboard interface. >> >> I'm not sure about the rest, but I suspect that onMouseDown, onMouseUp, >> onKeyDown, onKeyUp and onMouseMove are related to selecting a part of the >> document. In determining how to do that we are likely to sort out the >> relationship between the current device-dependent attributes and new >> 'logical' event triggers that can be triggered from various interfaces (eg >> voice) >> >> Which seems to me to leave onMouseOut and onDblClick out in the cold. One >> of the consequences of this is that we should recommend against using >> those events which we are likely to lose (except for providing 'eye-candy' >> - stuff that has no functional importance) and make suggestions about how >> the rest might be used in the page authoring guidelines. (have i said >> this before on this group? if so, sorry) >> >> Charles McCathieNevile >> >> From: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/1998OctDec/0029.html >> >> Chris is right, so for the sake of completeness I looked up all the event >> attributes again. Those which I think are device-dependent, and we should >> recommend not be used are: >> >> onMousedown, onMouseup, onMouseover, onMousemove, onMouseout, onKeydown, >> onKeyup, onKeypress, onClick, onDblclick >> >> Those which seem to be logical events are: >> >> onFocus, onBlur, onSelect, onChange, onSubmit, onReset, onLoad, onUnload. >> >> It should also be possible to define something like 'onActivate' - which >> would be equivalent to onClick for a link, but I guess this belongs to >> other groups. >> >> Charles McCathieNevile > >-- > -- Paul Adelson >------ >* The views expressed are those of the >* author and do not necessarily reflect the >* position of Citibank or its affiliates. > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Friday, 30 October 1998 11:28:06 UTC