- From: Cohn, Jonathan <jcohn@air.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:00:42 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Yes, but now lots of people have clicked on his site increasing his analytics and perhaps providing him some money. Personally I found the post more confusing than the W3C documents that are available, and that is saying something. My apologies in advance for my cynicism.
On 3/23/18, 5:45 AM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
On 23/03/2018 05:36, Sailesh Panchang wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Here is a link to an article for consideration:
> STATUS MESSAGES: IS THERE AN ACCESSIBILITY GAP THAT A NEW SUCCESS
> CRITERION SHOULD PLUG?
>
> http://www.mindoversight.com/?p=205
> This is supported by two other articles linked off the above.
Isn't that (at least in part) the point of 3.2.6. Status change in WCAG
2.1 ? https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#status-changes
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 14:01:10 UTC