Re: Status messages: an issue with distinguishable guideline perhaps

On 23/03/2018 05:36, Sailesh Panchang wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Here is a link  to an article for consideration:
> STATUS MESSAGES: IS THERE AN ACCESSIBILITY GAP THAT A NEW SUCCESS
> CRITERION SHOULD PLUG?
> 
> http://www.mindoversight.com/?p=205
> This is supported by two  other articles linked off the above.

Isn't that (at least in part) the point of 3.2.6. Status change in WCAG 
2.1 ? https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#status-changes

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Friday, 23 March 2018 09:33:16 UTC