- From: Tim <tim@wiseguysonly.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:59:32 +0100
- To: "'WAI list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This actually brings up a good point. With all the time that is spent on great open source "free for all" products on sites such as SourceForge, what do list members actually think is the reason that no large scale "open-source" accessibility validation tool exists. By this I mean a tool that is developed in the true open-source way - not by a for profit or not-for-profit organization, but by developers not even connected geographically. Tim -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hitchcock Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:06 PM To: 'Jonathan Chetwynd' Cc: 'WAI list' Subject: RE: Alternative validation tools. You are right, I did not describe my views. We made a choice and no longer have such rights. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:14 PM To: chitchcock@cast.org Cc: 'WAI list' Subject: Re: Alternative validation tools. Chuck, You didn't describe your views on open source. Have CAST signed away right to help develop such a product? Jonathan
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 15:58:52 UTC