- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:26:45 -0500 (EST)
- To: Tim <tim@wiseguysonly.com>
- cc: "'WAI list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
There is a tool (WAIDr) developed under the LGPL open source license, and there are people doing further work on it. I am trying t oget more details made available to both this group and the ER group (which is where tool development gets tracked). Cheers Chaals On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Tim wrote: > >This actually brings up a good point. > >With all the time that is spent on great open source "free for all" >products on sites such as SourceForge, what do list members actually >think is the reason that no large scale "open-source" accessibility >validation tool exists. > >By this I mean a tool that is developed in the true open-source way - >not by a for profit or not-for-profit organization, but by developers >not even connected geographically. > >Tim > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On >Behalf Of Chuck Hitchcock >Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:06 PM >To: 'Jonathan Chetwynd' >Cc: 'WAI list' >Subject: RE: Alternative validation tools. > > >You are right, I did not describe my views. We made a choice and no >longer have such rights. > >Chuck > >-----Original Message----- >From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On >Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd >Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:14 PM >To: chitchcock@cast.org >Cc: 'WAI list' >Subject: Re: Alternative validation tools. > > > >Chuck, > >You didn't describe your views on open source. >Have CAST signed away right to help develop such a product? > >Jonathan > > > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 19:26:46 UTC