to follow up on what Jason White said: > 'Option 1' I take to be that which changes the definition of > !important; so that it only has effect when used within a > reader's style sheet (any use of !important; in an author's > style sheet would thus be ignored, and the author's rules would > all have normal weight, thereby giving precedence to the > reader's explicitly important rules). This is the option which > I prefer. Is it really necessary to nullify all use of !important by the author? Would it be sufficient if a) a !important asserted by the user beats a !important asserted before the document got to the user. b) a !important beats any level of specificity. ?? -- Al GilmanReceived on Friday, 19 December 1997 11:44:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:35:01 UTC