W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-hc@w3.org > October to December 1997

RE: CSS 2: priorities in cascading order

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 19:00:34 +1100 (AEDT)
To: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.95.971219185415.6390A-100000@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote:

> I think we're in agreement.  Going back to my original message, and ignoring
> the browser UI option (#3), which of the other two options do you prefer?
> Option #1 which defines a new directive, or Option #2 which changes the
> ordering of the rules?

Option 1 I take to be that which changes the definition of !important; so
that it only has effect when used within a reader's style sheet (any use
of !important; in an author's style sheet would thus be ignored, and the
author's rules would all have normal weight, thereby giving precedence to
the reader's explicitly important rules). This is the option which I
prefe. The only counter-argument is one of backward compatibility. If the
use of !important; in authors' style sheets is ignored, then it can still
be said that all valid CSS 1 style sheets are likewise valid in CSS 2, but
the definition of importance changes. Given that the !important; directive
is a little-used feature at present, I think this change could be made
without resulting in major backward compatibility problems.
Received on Friday, 19 December 1997 03:01:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:12 UTC