Hi Andrew, The aspects from http://idpf.org/epub/a11y/#sec-wcag-eval that caught my eye as not fitting the ‘web page’ model were: > it is not sufficient for individual Content Documents to have a logical reading order if the publication presents them in the wrong order. > including a title for every Content Document is complementary to providing a title for the publication: the overall accessibility is affected if either is missing. > The inclusion of page boundary locations helps bridge this disparity by ensuring that those using reflowable media are not disadvantaged by their choice. So Page titles comes up as an odd cross-over point, and the new SC “Explicit navigation markers” would probably benefit from a separate definition. -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2020 13:52:45 UTC