- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 17:27:17 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I have what I think is a good work item for the ER IG. A summer student (Eric Cabrit) and I have been playing with the idea of a W3C/WAI "endorsed" report and tracking facility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/report It's not operational yet, no active CGI behind the scene, and the message preview is just a template, but we're not far from having it working and most of the issues we have right now are I think issues for the IG to deal with, the WG just acting as an implementation pool. Feedback is needed on several things, like: - general idea of W3C/WAI providing such a report, good or bad, useful or useless ? - what to do with the data: public or not, at what stage ? (current model suggest that the data is not public right away but can if nothing is done - with no definition of "nothing") - how to manage the liability risk for W3C (spammer, angry/insulting reporters, few mistakes, plain wrong report, etc) - maintenance of data: when to delete entries, forecast of usage (is human tracking of reports possible?) - how to subset the Page Author guidelines for reference from this form? - need to refine the outgoing message wording and identify how many translation to provide ?
Received on Monday, 10 August 1998 11:26:56 UTC