- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 18:12:01 +0200
- To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> > - maintenance of data: when to delete entries, forecast of usage (is > > human tracking of reports possible?) > > I suggest retest each month after first notification. Add comment into the > public "inaccessibility" list that it remains so with dates of tests (and > any sign of either improvement or further degeneration. This seems quite > schedulable for automated running. Remove URL when fixed (and send email > so indicating to the repairer, giving thanks for the work), and copy the > original reporter. Remove no longer valid URLs. The issue is, I'm not sure the things reported thru this form are all automatable, that's the main reason for having this form: to carry human judgement on web accessibility. > We may understand the jargon used in the form. Many site designers won't. yes, a help file will help > One strength of Bobby worth emulating is for each of the problems the > link to a more detailed explanation. > > Missing ALT on Image (or irrelevant) > I don't understand the parenthesized idea. HTML 4.0 requires ALT on all IMG. I meant "irrelevant description", like "foo.gif 34K" or "apple" for an orange. > I don't know what "misuse of UL" is about? it's when it's use to do margin/indent > Decouple "Moving/Blinking text and unexpected refresh" ok > "Page fubar and no Text-only" must be stated more clearly. Do you mean > "Page that depends on graphics has no text-only version"? I meant fubar as in "F*** Up Beyond All Recognition". (for those of you who didn't know, this is the ancestor of foobar, which later became foo and bar, common variable names in programs :-) Your working is better. > Browser Used: > > List excludes Opera. Yes, I took it from Bobby. > General Comment: this reporting form is nicely terse. Tabs step through it, > except for the browser used list. Should it be a radio button list as well ? > Preview of Message to be sent Message should go both to the reported URL > and copy back to the reporter. Isn't that what happen ? From: wai-report@w3.org To: webmaster@offender.com cc: reporter@foo.com Subject: Web Accessibility Report Message
Received on Thursday, 13 August 1998 12:12:02 UTC