- From: by way of Harvey Bingham <liddy@SUNRISERESEARCH.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:04:13 -0400
- To: "wai-eo" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Folks The DC accessibility drafting team have worked feverishly to complete three documents needed for the AccessForAll approach to accessibility in ISO. These documents, although worked on by the DC and IMS teams, as well as others, are more comprehensive than we are expecting for DC in the immediate future (as DC only will be concerned at this stage with the metadata for resources). Nevertheless reading them is recommended as they show the metadata model for AccessForAll accessibility. The idea is that a new term, adaptability, will be proposed for DC and then an application profile will be developed that will match the ISO documents. They have been constructed with the DC Abstract Model very much in mind and it is believed it will be relatively easy now to write the application profile. The first ISO document is a framework document and shows how accessibility metadata for all sorts of things can be constructed in time, but the first concern is digital resources. An example of what might be next is resources that mix digital delivery with real world objects, and another is events and their accessibility. Following the framework is a second part that specifies the description of needs and preferences for someone who is using digital means to access digital resources. The third part specifies how the resources need to be described for users so that their needs and preferences can be matched. It would really good if these documents could be read and commented on by a wide range of people. In the ISO context, where they are currently being processed, only countries can vote on them but all comments welcome. The docs are available for public comment: http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/36N1139.pdf Individualized Adaptability and Accessibility in E-learning, Education and Training Part 1: Framework 28 pages Project Editors: Jutta Triveranus, Libby Neville, Andy Heath I note that this includes a glossary; I haven't contrasted it with the one we've worked on. http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/36N1140.pdf (Personal needs and preferences) 82 pages http://jtc1sc36.org/doc/36N1141.pdf (Digital Resource Description) They are open for comment for four months before voting in the ISO process will take place prior to a meeting in Finland in February when they should be finalised. Comments can be sent to this list or posted on the wiki at http:// dublincore.org/accessibilitywiki/AccessForAllDrafts Liddy
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 13:04:32 UTC