W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

SV: EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference

From: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:37:47 +0200
To: "'EOWG'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

I have a few comments (hope you have not discussed this before as I've been
absent for a while)
I think this is a very important document to people from other countries
with maybe less knowledge of W3C/WAI.
I appreciate not using the 101 in the title as it makes no sense in this
part of the world (I’ve discussed with colleagues who translate books in
technical and psychological subjects and they say: “never use 101 for
I think the section:
Document stages to a W3C Recommendation should be moved up. Readers might
not see it if they don’t want to know about getting involved they want to
know about the process for a document to become a W3C recommendation. In the
introduction we talk about the process and then the first 2 sections talks
about the different types of documents and how to get involved. I suggest
that we change the order (apologies if this has been addressed and solved in
the last calls)
In the first part I have problems with the sentence:
“This page, the Overview pages linked in the list above, and most of the
other pages in the WAI Web site are WAI Resources.”
I had to read it several times to understand especially the insert “the
Overview pages linked in the list above” took me a long time to figure out
it is an example of WAI resources. Maybe it’s easier to understand if we
just take it out: “This page, and most of the other pages in the WAI Web
site are WAI Resources.” Maybe add it as an example at the end of the
“This page, and most of the other pages in the WAI Web site are WAI
Resources.” (As the Overview pages linked in the list above).
In 2. Last Call Working Draft:… I would like to have a sentence about
sending comments like in 1. Working Draft:… Comments received now are most
easily addressed. Maybe saying that comments are less easily addressed but
they can still be submitted.

Helle Bjarnø
Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre
Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
Phone: +45 39 46 01 01
fax: +45 39 61 94 14
e-mail hbj@visinfo.dk
Direct phone: +45 39 46 01 04

> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne af Shawn Henry
> Sendt: 9. august 2006 05:36
> Til: EOWG
> Emne: EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference
> Dear EOWG Participants:
> An agenda and calling logistics for our 11 August 2006 
> teleconference follow.
> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>              http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
> Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
> READING: Before the meeting, please read the links below, 
> especially under items 1 "Process 101", and be prepared to 
> discuss any issues you see.
> Agenda:
> 1. W3C Process Intro ("Process 101")
> * Review updated requirements analysis:
>        http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
> Note the new section "What the Personas Have to Say About It" at:
> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process#personas
> * Discuss revised ROUGH concept draft:
>        http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process
> - How is the overall approach? Is it more friendly? Is it too basic?
> - How does this order work? Might you miss the Process Stages 
> if you think the beginning is too basic for you?
> - Does it cover the right topics? Do we need to add anything? 
> Where can we cut back?
> - What about the title? (A few other ideas at:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#d2006-07-00 &
> 	http://www.w3.org/2006/08/07-eow2-minutes.html )
> Note: It's only a concept draft, the writing is not at all 
> refined yet.
> fyi: Previous drafts are listed in the "References" section 
> of the changelog:
> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#refs
> 2. Transitioning from WCAG 1.0 to 2.0 Resource Suite
> * Discuss requirements analysis:
> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-transition1to2
> Regards,
> ~ Shawn
> ===
> IRC reminders and tips:
> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not 
> have IRC. All 
> substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not 
> just in IRC).
> - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the 
> minutes, type 
> /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> will come out:
> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: 
> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): 
> http://www.irchelp.org/
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
> ###
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 08:38:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:39 UTC