RE: Changes to the current ATAG2 draft before Last Call publication

Hi Jan.

Yes I'm happy to go to Last Call as well.

Thanks,
Andrew.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jan Richards
Sent: 15 June 2010 21:36
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: re: Changes to the current ATAG2 draft before Last Call
publication

Hi all,

On Monday's call 
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0076.html), 
we (Jeanne, Greg, Ann, Jan, Jutta) dealt with a few remaining items 
raised by Alastair and concluded by all agreeing that we could continue 
to Last Call.

PLEASE - could all WG members who missed the call also give a reply 
(positive or negative) on whether it is ok for us to continue on to Last

Call with these changes.

Here are the approved changes Jeanne is working to add to an updated
draft:

APPROVED EDITORIAL:
===================
(1) "Implementing Success Criterion" is accidentally showing for A.3.1.6

Present Keyboard Commands

(2) Alistair's:
Appendix F (Comparison 1.0 to 2.0): The page it goes to is marked as
Appendix B, rather than F.

(3) B.2.3.1, B.2.3.2, B.2.3.3 have different wording of "(required in
X)" let's standardize to (as required by Success Criterion B.2.2.X)"

PREVIOUSLY APPROVED:
====================
(1) Change to A.3.2.3 re: Moving Targets 
(http://www.w3.org/2010/06/07-au-minutes.html#item03)

APPROVED MINOR:
===============
(1) Adding "Any":
"A.3.6.1 Save Settings: Any authoring tool display settings and control
settings are saved between authoring sessions..."

(2) Adding "Any":
"A.3.1.6 Present Keyboard Commands: Authoring tool user interface
controls can be presented with any associated keyboard commands..."

(3) Split "content (web content)" and "Web content properties". Without 
any other substantive change. Wording here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2010AprJun/0068.html

APPROVED MORE SUBSTANTIVE:
==========================
(1) Rewording B.2.2.1, B.2.2.5, B.2.2.8:
"B.2.2.1 Check Accessibility (WCAG Level A): If the authoring tool 
provides authors with the ability to add or modify web content so that 
any WCAG 2.0 Level A Success Criteria can be violated, then 
accessibility checking for those success criteria is provided..."

(2) A.3.1.3 Keyboard Shortcuts will be remain UNCHANGED.
(Instead JR has an action to send some wording for the non-normative 
"Implementing ATAG 2.0" doc)

Cheers,
Jan



-- 
(Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc.
jan.richards@utoronto.ca | 416-946-7060

Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
Faculty of Information | University of Toronto



 To report this e-mail as Spam, please forward it to:
spam@mailcontrol.com


-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk



This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security - 
http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx

Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 13:57:54 UTC