Re: clarification and question

It seems to me that we are not quite ready for a last call vote today.

Within the most recent ATAG 2.0 work
<http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/guidelines.html>
there are still some important outstanding issues:

- success criteria for 3.1,

- success criteria for 4.1,

- checkpoint text AND success criteria for 4.3,

- many of the rationales are still up in the air,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2004OctDec/0049.html

- some confusion remains about what part of the ISO doc we require 
developers to comply with (and we need to decide on a way to introduce 
the ISO doc within ATAG 2.0),

- and most of the glossary is still not finalized.

---

Hopefully we can address a few of these today but I doubt whether we 
will get to them all.

Cheers,
Jan

PS: On the weekend I started updating the techniques documents. 
Following the changes to the success criteria, quite a few of the 
techniques need work.

http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/techs.html
http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech1.html
http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech2.html
http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html
http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html

Also: Thanks to Roberto for updating the checklist:
http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/full-checklist.html

-- 
Jan Richards, M.Sc.
User Interface Design Specialist
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto

   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
   Phone: 416-946-7060
   Fax:   416-971-2896

Received on Monday, 8 November 2004 18:06:27 UTC